One system, every artist
A shared component base with per-artist identity on top. Your roster reads as a roster — same structural quality, same load speed, same booking flow — while each artist still looks like nobody else.
FOR MANAGERS & BOOKING AGENCIES
A ROSTER THAT LOOKS LIKE A ROSTER
You represent thirty artists and thirty different link-in-bio pages. To a promoter comparing options, that reads as thirty hobbyists. One consistent web presence across the roster is the cheapest credibility you can buy — and it makes every pitch email land harder.
Talk roster scale20–50
Artists per roster
3–5
Days per artist after setup
1
Person you talk to
0
Dashboards to learn
01Approach
Built for volume, not for one hero page
Single-artist thinking breaks at roster scale. This is built the other way around.
Rollout, not a big bang
Artists ship in waves. Priority names first, the long tail behind them. Nothing waits on a roster-wide launch date, and a signing next month slots into the same pipeline.
Turnaround that fits a release cycle
First artist in 10–14 days while the system is set. Every artist after that lands in 3–5 days, because the hard part is already built and only identity and content change.
One point of contact
You send content, I ship it. No account manager, no ticket queue, no five-person agency overhead priced into the invoice. Edits across the whole roster go to one inbox.
02Roster scanHow much of
How much of
your roster is
invisible?
Run the list. Count how many of your artists a promoter could research in thirty seconds without opening Instagram. That number is usually close to zero, and it is costing you bookings.
SOS / SCAN
SECTOR: UNDERGROUND
TARGETS 8
STATUS: NO SITE
Tap a blip for readout
03Contact
Send me the roster
Tell me roughly how many artists, which ones are priority, and what your release calendar looks like for the next quarter. I'll come back with a phased plan and roster pricing.